The Cosmic Paradigm Newsletter
by Mark Kimmel & Associates
January 28, 2005
Dear Friends,
Welcome to all those joining us for the first time. I am grateful to those who
continue. This newsletter now goes out to people around the globe. Thank you for
the opportunity to share the truth about the larger reality.
The material immediately below is a chapter from my new handbook, “Creating the
Cosmic Paradigm.” Folks who attended my recent talks in Florida and New York
received a copy of the book. I will have it available in Montrose and in Denver
for those talks. Those of you who are meeting with me individually will receive
a copy. It is not available in bookstores. It will be available at
http://www.cosmicparadigm.com
as soon as I work out details.
I suspect this material will rub some of you the wrong way. I am sure to be
accused of focusing on the dark side of our existing paradigm. Yes, this
material is dark; it is also true. As we discussed in New York and Florida, it
is like being in a dark tunnel. What I discovered were people who were able to
focus on the light at the end of the tunnel. I encourage each of you to do just
that.
Obfuscation (Chapter 7)
Records, from as far back as 1931, indicate that various agencies of the U.S.
government, and individuals under contract to the government, have conducted
secret experiments on unsuspecting human subjects. These include experiments to
discover reactions to radiation, cancer, syphilis, malaria, mustard gas,
lewisite, fluoride, bacteria, viruses, yellow fever, dioxin, hepatitis, and
anthrax. Without informing them, these experiments have used hospital patients,
prisoners, military personnel, and the general populace. These incidents
occurred repeatedly, at different locations, and with different groups of
subjects.
Beginning with project MKULTRA in the 1950s, various intelligence agencies
conducted mind control and behavior modification experiments. In addition to
various psychiatric modalities, mind-altering drugs such as LSD were utilized.
Electromagnetic waves, psychotronics, were shown to produce a variety of
affects.
These abuses have come to light only after those responsible were no longer in
positions of authority and/or deceased. There have been investigations, hand
wringing, promises to desist, but few repercussions.
Numbed people watch power struggles as they play before us in the news. Politics
is a favorite game to distract the masses from the actions of those who really
control our lives. Corporate scandals, financial maneuverings, corrupt
government officials, and crimes of violence all play important roles in helping
the public to focus on the darker side of our existence – without really
changing the basics of the game. Movies and television keep us locked into a
never–ending “Alice in Wonderland” reality.
Mind control has evolved from the days of overt propaganda. Today it involves
everything from the covert messages of Hollywood and the media to the
brainwashing provided to military and intelligence operatives to the recruitment
of the unwary into undertaking acts of violence. Mind control can never be used
for good; by its very nature – control – it invades the decision-making process
of another.
Beyond the media and mind control is the monitoring of the populace. Recent
terrorist threats have made the need for surveillance more acceptable to the
public. Telephone conversations are routinely monitored for key words and
phrases. The Internet provides freedom of expression and huge amounts of
information. Now it too is the subject of scrutiny by those looking to control
people.
Hundreds of books and millions of web sites currently offer stories about
extraterrestrial contact. Yet, popular opinion, mainstream media, and official
pronouncements refuse to deal with the subject.
The belief among UFO investigators is that it was okay in the forties and
fifties to hide the reality of UFOs and extraterrestrials, to misinform, to lie.
They contend that people simply were not ready to receive the information. That
was not true then; it is not true today.
If we examine the history of contact more closely, we see a different picture.
There is the truism that, “knowledge is power.” Those who have known the truth
about extraterrestrial contact, those who were involved with it, saw that this
gave them an edge over their fellow man. Disclosure would have lessened their
power, their ability to control. Therefore, they deliberately hid the truth.
After this began, even if some had wanted to, the majority of those in the know
recognized that they had much to account for, and were unwilling to take the
consequences. So, they continued to hide the truth.
Sure, many UFO events surfaced in one newspaper or another, on local radio and
television, but those who wished to hide the truth made sure it went no further.
It was easy to ridicule the occasional article as the imagination of a crazy
person.
Digging deeper, we find a more nefarious situation. Several crashes of ET craft
had provided debris. With several years and billion of dollars,
reverse-engineering efforts have born fruit. In cooperation with key private
sector corporations, advanced technologies were forthcoming. Integrated
circuits, fiber optics, night vision goggles, and lasers resulted. Now, there
was even more motivation to hide the truth.
Over the last fifty years, there have been many former military and intelligence
people willing to testify to the cover-up of extraterrestrial contact. Their
stories have been amazingly consistent: They have witnessed UFOs over military
bases. They have been involved in incidents where ET craft crashed. They have
been involved in retrieving pieces and parts of craft. They have seen and
communicated with off-planet beings. They have been a party to and have
witnessed the dedicated and systematic effort to hide all of these events.
The media have played a vital role in keeping truth from the public and
assisting in mind control. The intelligence community has conspired with certain
members of the national media to engage in propaganda, as well as censorship,
targeting, character assassination, disinformation, requiring “scientific”
proof, confiscation of evidence, sabotage, threats, harassment, and
incarceration. Control of the national media is in the hands of a few large
corporations.
Behind these efforts, buried even deeper within intelligence organizations and
their corporate confederates, is active cooperation with off-planet beings. Only
at the deepest levels of black operations, at the highest levels of covert
organizations, within certain financial and corporate entities, is the truth
known. The testimony of a few courageous participants and circumstantial
evidence surrounding certain incidents points to the reality of this situation.
ALF have confirmed the existence of this arrangement. The situation is
encouraged by those heading our institutions, by those seeking power over their
fellow man.
Focus 7: With the success at hiding the truth, it is no wonder that so many
people find it hard to admit to a larger reality. Open yourself to possibilities
outside the box, and it will emerge.
The cover-up of secret experiments shows how some in positions of power are
willing to abuse those they consider inferior. Even when these experiments come
to light, there is no public reaction, no outrage. Why? Does anyone doubt that
similar experiments are being carried out today, perhaps with the lives of those
reading these words?
Which of our commonly consumed foods and drugs are the results of such
experiments? Which of our foods are designed to enhance our acceptance of the
conventional paradigm, to numb us to the larger reality?
The cover-up of UFOs and extraterrestrial contact is a big story; it is also but
the tip of the iceberg. Those who know have managed to keep the truth below the
“radar screen” of the public for the past fifty years in order to maintain the
status quo, to keep their power structure in place. What would cause those who
have been burying the truth about UFOs and extraterrestrials to disclose it?
_______________
At the end of this email are two articles, one from the New York Times, the
second from the Australian. Those of you with whom I have met personally know
that I consider the melting of the polar ice caps a significant barometer of the
health of this planet – because we are creating the problem by burning fossil
fuels. For the ramifications of melting polar ice, see my web site and my past
newsletters.
---
Each of us must soon make a decision as to where we stand. Will you go along
with the majority as they slip into a world dominated the few? Or, will you join
with others who are awakening, join with them to use a higher consciousness to
transform this planet to a place of beauty, peace, and abundance for all? When
we reach a critical mass, a small percentage really -- the hundredth monkey
principle -- the transformation to a state of higher consciousness will be swift
and sure. The Cosmic Paradigm Network is dedicated to assisting the positive
transformation of this planet. Join us at
http://www.cosmicparadigm.com/
---
As I have mentioned to you before, I have launched a mission to visit with as
many people, one-on-one, as feasible. Current plans have me in New Mexico in
early July (I’m speaking at the Roswell gathering), Northern California in late
July and early August, Oregon in late August, British Columbia, Washington, &
Idaho in September, and Colorado in early October. Can we add you to our
itinerary?
In Truth and Love,
Mark
---
You probably received two copies of this newsletter. We have a new email service
and are testing it. Our new email address is
cp@zqyx.org
You can order the paperback versions of TRILLION & DECIMAL at
http://www.UFO-truth.com/ . Both are
available through bookstores.
The information presented in this newsletter is based on what we believe to be
true. It is from reliable sources and our own personal experience. Copies of
earlier newsletters and special reports are available at
http://www.cosmicparadigm.com/
If you do not wish to receive these periodic mailings, or if you are receiving
more than one copy, please follow the instructions at the bottom. We are always
happy to receive your comments and question; we will reply.
---
This editorial opinion is provided by Mark Kimmel. For breaking news,
information, personal stories, newsletters, and books relating to
extraterrestrials, implications of extraterrestrial contact, and the cosmic
paradigm go to www.cosmicparadigm.com
To comment on this newsletter send your statement to
cp@zqyx.org
Web site:
http://www.cosmicparadigm.com/
Subscriptions to Newsletters and Cosmic Paradigm Network:
http://www.cosmicparadigm.com/
Re-distribution and proper re-posting of this document is appreciated.
Please use proper net etiquette when doing so.
If you wish to be removed from this mailing list: Please respond to this email
at cp@zqyx.org and include the word
REMOVE in the subject heading of your response.
---
Antarctica, Warming, Looks Ever More Vulnerable
LARRY ROHTER, The New York Times
Over the Abbott Ice Shelf Antarctica -- From an airplane at 500 feet, all that
is visible here is a vast white emptiness. Ahead, a chalky plain stretches as
far as the eye can see, the monotony broken only by a few gentle rises, and the
wrinkles created when new sheets of ice form.
Under the surface of that ice, though, profound and potentially troubling
changes are taking place, and at a quickened pace. With temperatures climbing in
parts of Antarctica in recent years, melt water seems to be penetrating deeper
and deeper into ice crevices, weakening immense and seemingly impregnable
formations that have developed over thousands of years.
As a result, huge glaciers in this and other remote areas of Antarctica are
thinning and ice shelves the size of American states are either disintegrating
or retreating - all possible indications of global warming. Scientists from the
British Antarctic Survey reported in December that in some parts of the
Antarctic Peninsula hundreds of miles from here, large growths of grass are
appearing in places that until recently were hidden under a frozen cloak.
“ The evidence is piling up; everything fits," Dr. Robert Thomas, a glaciologist
from NASA who is the lead author of a recent paper on accelerating sea-level
rise, said as the Chilean Navy plane flew over the sea ice here on an unusually
clear day late in November. "Around the Amundsen Sea, we have surveyed a half
dozen glaciers. All are thinning, in some cases quite rapidly, and in each case,
the ice shelf is also thinning."
The relationship between glaciers (essentially frozen rivers) and ice shelves
(thick plates of ice protruding from the land and floating on the ocean) is
complicated and not fully understood. But scientists like to compare the spot
where the "tongue" of a glacier flows to sea in the form of an ice shelf to a
cork in a bottle. When the ice shelf breaks up, this can allow the inland ice to
accelerate its march to the sea.
“ By themselves, the tongue of the glacier or the cork in the bottle do not
represent that much," said Dr. Claudio Teitelboim, the director of the Center
for Scientific Studies, a private Chilean institution that is the partner of the
National Aeronautics and Space Administration in surveying the ice fields of
Antarctica and Patagonia. "But once the cork is dislodged, the contents of the
bottle flow out, and that can generate tremendous instability."
Glaciologists also know that by itself, free-floating sea ice does not raise the
level of the sea, just as an ice cube in a glass of water does not cause an
overflow as it melts. But glaciers are different because they rest on land, and
if that vast volume of ice slides into the sea at a high rate, this adds mass to
the ocean, which in turn can raise the global sea level.
Through their flights over this and other areas of Antarctica, NASA and the
Chilean center hope to help glaciologists and other scientists interested in
climate change understand what is taking place on the continent and why. To do
that, they need to compile data not only on ice thicknesses but also the
underlying geology of the region, information that is most easily obtained from
the air.
The flights are taking place aboard a Chilean Navy Orion P-3 plane that has been
specially equipped with sophisticated instruments. The devices include a
laser-imaging system that shoots 5,000 pulses of light per second at the ground
to map the ice surface, as well as ice-penetrating radar to determine the depth
of the ice sheets, a magnetometer and digital cameras.
For most parts of Antarctica, reliable records go back less than 50 years, and
data from satellites and overflights like the ones going on here have been
collected over only the past decade or so. But that research, plus striking
changes that are visible to the naked eye, all point toward the disturbance of
climate patterns thought to have been in place for thousands of years.
In 1995, for instance, the Larsen A ice shelf disintegrated, followed in 1998 by
the collapse of the nearby Wilkins ice shelf. Over a 35-day period early in
2002, at the end of the Southern Hemisphere summer, the Larsen B ice shelf
shattered, losing more than a quarter of its total mass and setting thousands of
icebergs adrift in the Weddell Sea.
"The response time scale of ice dynamics is a lot shorter than we used to think
it was," said Dr. Robert Bindschadler, a NASA scientist who is director of the
West Antarctic Ice Sheet Initiative. "We don't know what the exact cause is, but
what we observe going on today is likely to be what is also happening tomorrow."
Thus far, all of the ice shelves that have collapsed are located on the
Antarctic peninsula. In reality a collection of islands, mountain ranges and
glaciers, the peninsula juts northward toward Argentina and Chile and is "really
getting hot, competing with the Yukon for the title of the fastest warming place
on the globe," in the words of Dr. Eric Steig, a glaciologist who teaches at the
University of Washington.
According to a recent study published in Geophysical Research Letters, the
discharge rate of three important glaciers still remaining on the peninsula
accelerated eightfold just from 2000 to 2003. "Ice is thinning at the rate of
tens of meters per year" on the peninsula, with glacier elevations in some
places having dropped by as much as 124 feet in six months, the study found.
But the narrow peninsula contains relatively little inland ice. Glaciologists
are more concerned that they are now beginning to detect similar signs closer to
the South Pole, on the main body of the continent, where ice shelves are much
larger - and could contribute far more to sea level changes. Of particular
interest is this remote and almost inaccessible region known as "the weak
underbelly of West Antarctica," where some individual ice shelves are as large
as Texas or Spain and much of the land on which they rest lies under sea level.
"This is probably the most active part of Antarctica," said Dr. Eric Rignot, a
glaciologist at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., and the
principal author of the Geophysical Research Letters paper. "Glaciers are
changing rapidly and increasingly discharging into the ocean, which contributes
to sea level rise in a more significant way than any other part of Antarctica."
According to another paper, published in the journal Science in September, "the
catchment regions of Amundsen Sea glaciers contain enough ice to raise sea level
by 1.3 meters," or about four feet. While the current sea level rise
attributable to glacier thinning here is a relatively modest 0.2 millimeters a
year, or about 10 percent of the total global increase, the paper noted that
near the coast the process had accelerated and might continue to do so.
As a result, the most recent flights of NASA and the Chilean center have been
directed over the Thurston Island and Pine Island zones of West Antarctica, near
the point where the Bellinghausen and Amundsen Seas come together. The idea is
to use the laser and radar readings being gathered to establish a base line for
comparison with future measurements, to be taken every two years or so.
"We're not sure yet how to connect what we see on the peninsula with what we
observe going on further south, but both are very clearly dramatic and dynamic
events," Dr. Bindschadler said. "On the peninsula, large amounts of melt water
are directly connected to disintegration of the ice shelf, but the actual
mechanism in West Antarctica, whether melt water, a slippery hill or a firmer
bedrock, is not yet clear. Hence the need for more data."
The information being gathered here coincides with the recent publication of a
report on accelerating climate change in the Arctic, an area that has been far
more scrutinized than Antarctica. That study, commissioned by the United States
and seven other nations, found permafrost there to be thawing and glaciers and
sea ice to be retreating markedly, raising new concerns about global warming and
its impact.
“ The Arctic has lots of land at high latitudes, and the presence of land masses
helps snow melt off more quickly," said Dr. Steig. "But there's not a lot of
land to speak of in the high latitudes of the Southern Hemisphere," making the
search for an explanation of what is going on here even more complicated.
The hypotheses scientists offer for the causes of glacier and ice shelf thinning
in Antarctica are varied. Rising air, land and ocean temperatures or some
combination of them have all been cited.
Some scientists have even proposed that a healing of the seasonal ozone hole
over the South Pole and southernmost Chile, a phenomenon expected to take place
in the next 50 years or so, could change the circulation of the atmosphere over
the frozen continent in ways that could accelerate the thinning of Antarctic ice
fields. But even without that prospect, the situation developing in Antarctica
is already sobering, glaciologists agree. The data being collected here in West
Antarctica and on the peninsula farther north make that obvious, they say,
though the degree to which that should be cause for concern around the rest of
the planet will become clear only with more research.
"If Antarctica collapses, it will have a major effect on the whole globe," Dr.
Rignot cautioned. He warned that "this is not for tomorrow, and Antarctica is
such a big place that it's important to look at other areas" around the
perimeter of the giant continent, but added, "Nature is playing a little
experiment with us, showing us what could happen if the plug were to be
removed."
---
'SCARY' SCIENCE FINDS EARTH HEATING UP TWICE AS FAST AS THOUGHT
By Leigh Dayton
The Australian
January 27, 2005
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,12063396%255E30417,00.html
The largest ever climate-change experiment reveals that scientists may have
dramatically underestimated the threat of global warming.
The study by British scientists, which is published today, found the planet's
global temperature could climb by between 2C and 11C because of skyrocketing
levels of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide.
That more than doubles the current prediction of a 1.4C to 4.5C rise this
century.
"When we started out we didn't expect anything like this," said Oxford
University's David Stainforth, chief scientist for climateprediction.net
The project is a collaboration of experts at Oxford and Reading universities,
The Open University, London School of Economics, Hadley Centre for Climate
Prediction and Research, and Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
The findings are published in the journal Nature.
"If this is the case, it's very dramatic and very scary," Mr Stainforth said.
Even rises that are more modest are expected to trigger disastrous changes,
including melting glaciers, sea-level rises, shut-down of the Gulf Stream, and
increases in droughts, cyclones and other extreme weather events. The new
results follow two reports in last week's edition of Science, showing that
global warming probably caused the "Great Dying".
Although that was the worst extinction in Earth's history -- wiping out more
than 90 per cent of all life -- it involved gradual extinctions over about 10
million years, culminating in a sharp extinction pulse 250 million years ago.
Further concern comes from an international report released in London last
Monday. It warned that climate change could kick in within 10 years, unless
greenhouse gas emissions are cut.
The initial goal of climateprediction.net was to evaluate the sensitivity and
variables of the Hadley computer model of climate change.
In order to obtain their findings, Mr Stainforth and his colleagues ran 50,000
climate simulations.
Because so much computing power was needed, they relied on help from 90,000
people from 150 countries to run the programs on their personal computers.
More than 1200 Australians, sych as Melbourne academic Nick Hoffman,
participated. "I'm interested in the dynamics of planetary atmospheres, so it
was well worth supporting (the project)," Dr Hoffman said.
According to Neville Nicholls, head of climate forecasting at the Bureau of
Meterology in Melbourne, climateprediction.net is a "terrific project" that
tackles the uncertainty of climate predictions. He agreed with CSIRO climate
modeller Tony Hirst that: "This may mean that the world could warm up faster
than most of us are happy anticipating."